Exploring Classical Theism and Physicalism :: Religion

Exploring Classical Theism and PhysicalismABSTRACT Could a classical theist be a physicalist? Although a negative answer to this question may attend obvious, it turns out that a case can be made for the consistency of a variant of classical theism and global supervenience materialism. Although intriguing, the case ultimately fails due to the weakness of global supervenience as an account of the dependence of mental on physical properties.Physicalism is popular these days, and to a lesser extent so is classical theism. It should and then come as no surprise that a number of theists are bent on combining theism with physicalism. But could a classical theist be a physicalist? Is this a coherent doctrinal combination? The classical theist affirms the metaphysically necessary existence of a concrete, purely spiritual, being upon which every new(prenominal) concrete being is ontologically dependent. The physicalist, however, is committed to the proposition that everything, or at least everything concrete, is any physical or determined by the physical. To be a cunt more precise, physicalism is usefully viewed as the conjunction of an inventory thesis which specifies physicalistically admissible individuals and a determination thesis which specifies physicalistically admissible properties.(1) What the inventory thesis says, at a first approximation, is that every concretum is either a physical item or composed of physical items. As for the determination thesis, what it says is that physical property-instantiations determine all other property-instantiations equivalently, every nonphysical property-instantiation supervenes on physical property-instantiations. These rough characterizations suggest that theism and physicalism logically exclude one another. If God as classically conceived exists, then the inventory thesis is violated not every concrete entity is either physical or composed of physical items. And if God exists, it would also appear that the determina tion thesis is flouted Gods instantiation of his omni-attributes does not supervene on His instantiation of any physical properties He has none. So at first glance it seems almost crashingly obvious that the classical theist cannot be a physicalist.But this smatter cannot end just yet. For when we get down to the details of formulating precise versions of both the inventory and determination theses, it turns out that there is a way to attempt the satisfaction of theism and physicalism. It is the viability of this way that I aim to explore. But first some background.Towards Nonreductive PhysicalismI will take it for granted that a plausible version of physicalism cannot be either eliminativist or reductionist.